Home News DPS Shop Contact
  DOT CITY
About
Homes
Hangouts
Hollywood
New Jersey
Round Table
Walking Tour
  PARKER FANS
Audio-Video
Parkerfest
Gallery
Newsletter
The Book
Links
T-Shirts
News Blog
  • January 1999
  • February 1999
  • March 1999
  • April 1999
  • May 1999
  • June 1999
  • July 1999
  • August 1999
  • September 1999
  • October 1999
  • November 1999
  • December 1999
  • January 2000
  • February 2000
  • March 2000
  • April 2000
  • May 2000
  • June 2000
  • July 2000
  • August 2000
  • September 2000
  • October 2000
  • November 2000
  • December 2000
  • January 2001
  • February 2001
  • April 2001
  • May 2001
  • August 2001
  • September 2001
  • November 2001
  • December 2001
  • February 2002
  • June 2002
  • August 2002
  • October 2002
  • November 2002
  • December 2002
  • June 2003
  • August 2003
  • December 2003
  • January 2004
  • February 2004
  • April 2004
  • May 2004
  • June 2004
  • July 2004
  • August 2004
  • September 2004
  • October 2004
  • November 2004
  • December 2004
  • January 2005
  • February 2005
  • March 2005
  • May 2005
  • July 2005
  • October 2005
  • December 2005
  • January 2006
  • February 2006
  • March 2006
  • April 2006
  • May 2006
  • June 2006
  • July 2006
  • August 2006
  • September 2006
  • November 2006
  • December 2006
  • January 2007
  • March 2007
  • April 2007
  • May 2007
  • June 2007
  • July 2007
  • August 2007
  • September 2007
  • October 2007
  • November 2007
  • December 2007
  • January 2008
  • February 2008
  • March 2008
  • April 2008
  • May 2008
  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • September 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  •  
    Dorothy Parker News Blog  
     

    Parker Copyright Battle: Heading for a Finale?

    It seems like we have been following the Dorothy Parker Copyright Fight since we were a freshman in high school. Not really. Only six years. However, there is news to report. As TheStreet.com reported today, the case is going to a judge next week. Federal Court normally does not get a chance to hear poems get tossed around, but Dorothy Parker will be the subject of Silverstein v. Penguin Putnam Inc.

    In brief (and this is hard to do) Stuart Y. Silverstein compiled and edited Not Much Fun: The Lost Poems of Dorothy Parker. He offered it to Penguin Books, which publishes many other Parker books. They declined. Then in 1999, Penguin published Dorothy Parker Complete Poems, and used a photocopy of Fun as a section of the book. Silverstein sued them. He won a round. Then Penguin won an appeal. Then it went back and forth. The book was pulled from stores. And now here we are for what could be the final chapter.

    As TheStreet.com says today:
    "We don't think there is a copyright issue here. We think this is factual material that anyone has a right to use," says Alex Gigante, Penguin Group USA's senior vice president for legal affairs. "If [Silverstein] has found some undiscovered Parker poems, he's done a great bit of research, but everyone else has a right to use them."

    However, the copyright issue could decide a new wrinkle in copyright law. TheStreet.com says today:
    "The appellate court said there were some details Judge Keenan had not considered," says Silverstein's attorney Mark Rabinowitz of Neal, Gerger & Eisenberg. "The issue to be decided now is whether Stuart's selection of poems shows a minimal level of creativity. If we establish minimal, more than slight, creativity, then we have copyright protection for the entire compilation."

    And good news: your esteemed president of the Dorothy Parker Society will be attending the trial, notebook in hand. Watch this space for more developments.

    Labels: ,

    Posted by Kevin Fitzpatrick on Monday, July 09, 2007 at 12:33 PM | Permalink

    AddThis Social Bookmark Button



    Post a Comment

     
    Copyright © 1998-2008 Kevin C. Fitzpatrick/Dorothy Parker Society. All Rights Reserved.